DredgingToday
  • Capital Dredging
  • Maintenance Dredging
  • Land Reclamation
  • Port Expansion
  • Coastal Protection
  • More News
JobsNewsletter
DredgingToday logo

Your trusted source for global dredging news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Authorities & Government
  • Beach Nourishment
  • Berth Expansion
  • Breakwater Construction
  • Breakwater Construction & Repair
Network
  • Dredging Today
  • NavalToday
  • Offshore Wind
  • Offshore Energy
  • Maritieme Vacaturebank
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report Your News
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Business & Finance›Australia: GBRMPA Must Use Its Powers to Protect GBR, Says WWF
Business & Finance

December 11, 2013 · about 12 years ago

Australia: GBRMPA Must Use Its Powers to Protect GBR, Says WWF

Conservation groups say the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) must use its powers to protect the World Heritage-listed asset from a massive dredging project. The federal government this week approved a major dredging project to expand the Abbot Point coal terminal in north Queensland

1 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email

Conservation groups say the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) must use its powers to protect the World Heritage-listed asset from a massive dredging project.

The federal government this week approved a major dredging project to expand the Abbot Point coal terminal in north Queensland.

The approval gives the go-ahead for three million cubic metres of dredge spoil to be dumped offshore, in the Great Barrier Marine Park.

But the developers must still gain permits from GBRMPA to dispose of dredge spoils inside the park boundaries. GBRMPA has 10 business days from Wednesday to make a decision.

Conservation groups WWF and the Australian Marine Conservation Society spokeswoman Felicity Wishart says it should be a no-brainer for the authority.

“ How can GBRMPA approve dumping when they don’t know where it’s going ,” she said.

“ It’s like approving a sewage plant when you don’t yet know where the waste is going ,” Ms Wishart said.

WWF spokesman Richard Leck said the authority’s own research has shown the dredging impacts will be far worse than the developers claim.

“ The research also found that sediment can travel for up to 80km, and be churned up again and again ,” he said.

A GBRMPA spokeswoman declined to comment and instead supplied a written statement which says the matter is being considered by a senior delegate nominated by GBRMPA’s chairman Russell Reichelt.

[mappress]

Press Release, December 12, 2013

Reach the DredgingToday industry in one go!

DredgingToday is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow DredgingToday on:

Filed under

Business & FinanceEquipmentTechnology

Daily news in your mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1Boskalis: Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East adversely impact activity levels
  2. 2Anaklia dredging project accelerates with two Jan De Nul TSHDs in the area
  3. 3VIDEO: Damen TSHD Kapuka gears up for sea trials
  4. 4Spotlight on Tuvalu Coastal Adaptation Project in Funafuti

Daily news in your mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free